3 ms·
Hello and welcome to the 32:9 master race. Seriously, to each their own. Never had any issues with 16:9 anywhere and I generally prefer wider screens.
by FeistySkink 6y ago
Hello and welcome to the 32:9 master race. Seriously, to each their own. Never had any issues with 16:9 anywhere and I generally prefer wider screens.
- numlock86 6y ago> Seriously, to each their own. This. All my screens are in portrait orientation. 9:16.
- PaulKeeble 6y agoOn the desktop with 1920x1080 I definitely feel that 16:9 is a problem and if you expand that to 32:9 it doesn't really help. But once you go to 2560x1440 with slightly bigger screens the issue with 16:9 generally becomes wasted horizontal space. I have found with 2x 16:9 that a lot of interfaces really haven't caught up to the widescreen aspect yet and I imagine that is worse. 32:9 is going to be great for gaming however and that is largely where I think 16:9 is much better than 4:3 and why I used triple screens in the past.
- FeistySkink 6y agoYou don't need to stretch one thing across the whole screen. But you can easily have 3-5 things side by side depending on your workflow.
- calgoo 6y agoI have a ultrawide screen monitor on my desk that is 21:9 ( 2560x1080). I love this thing, as its perfect for 2 full windows next to each other.
- jeppesen-io 6y ago> 32:9 master race living the dream, my friend