3 ms·
I've been wondering the same thing. Journals are mostly out of the question unless you've got time to spare. Conferences might be better if you've got something
by yid 15y ago
I've been wondering the same thing. Journals are mostly out of the question unless you've got time to spare. Conferences might be better if you've got something novel that can get through peer review, and have a few months to spare.
Perhaps consider writing it up from a generic point of view, adding references where necessary, and post a link on HN and security mailing lists? Or submit a paper to arXiv?
- Yoric 15y agoIn this case, I believe that there's enough novel stuff to make it a conference paper, but not the time to make it through peer review. > Perhaps consider writing it up from a generic point of view, adding references where necessary, and post a link on HN and security mailing lists? Or submit a paper to arXiv? I'll think about it, thanks.
- tonyarkles 15y agoMy experience with conference papers (albeit limited) is that it doesn't actually take that much effort to make it through the peer review process, so long as you've got something novel and interesting, and you've taken the time to find the correct context for it (correct conference, correct related work, etc).