4 ms·
Because X11 is such a joke. The problem is solved by wlroots and layer-shell, other Wayland compositors probably have similar things. Swaylock works 100%ly reli
by bionade24 6y ago
Because X11 is such a joke. The problem is solved by wlroots and layer-shell, other Wayland compositors probably have similar things. Swaylock works 100%ly reliable until now (For me). I had problems with every other X11 screenlocker I used in the past. My unusual setup with a docking station and two monitors on it often caused crazy bugs.
Edit: For me stuff
- Munksgaard 6y agoWhat's your take on the issues listed by formerly_proven[0]? 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25844338 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25844338
- bionade24 6y agoI'll edit it to (for me). With working on an X11 desktop everyday, it felt like everyone has at least once experienced such an issue. To be fair to swaylock, they actually fixed some of those issues, in contrast to kscreenlocker which are just ignoring most edge-case bugs, because it's nearly impossible to fix them.
- Androider 6y agoIt's still a fundamentally flawed design, because the system fails open when the locker crashes. So it seems Sway / Wayland actually didn't learn anything in this area, and suffers from exactly the same problem as X11 when it comes to the lockscreen.
- PurpleFoxy 6y agoIt seems like most of the complaints I see about distros have actually been solved problems for years but held back by poor distro defaults. I have been recommending fedora to people for a while because their defaults are far more modern and sane rather than clinging on to python 2 and X11
- bionade24 6y agoBut then you are breaking enterprise stuff !!!1!11!
- canofbars 6y agoMy favourite moment was when fedora turned on CGroups v2 after every distro waited years for docker to update to it. Docker was broken on fedora until you manually turned v1 back on but then docker suddenly upgraded to support v2.
- josefx 6y agoOther commenters link to similar issues with Wayland screen lockers. So I am not sure how the current shiny fixes things. > python 2 In contrast to Wayland that can be installed in parallel to python 3. So the only reason to remove it is if you enjoy breaking working software.
- canofbars 6y agoIts not that they still had python 2, its that the binary "python" referred to python 2 on ubuntu (it might even still be like this) while other distros had it pointed to python 3.
- josefx 6y agoGiven that python versions are incompatible by design you should probably explicitly refer to the version your code supports. At least that is my takeaway from this mess.
- stretchcat 6y agoThis whole situation is a bad trap for novices, given how many tutorials, class slides, etc ask students to copy/paste various invocations of pip and python that may or may not work verbatim on their distro.