> seems ideal for securing a monopoly Seems like a bit of a catch-22, doesn't it? If we set moderation standards too low, then big social-media companies are e

> seems ideal for securing a monopoly Seems like a bit of a catch-22, doesn't it? If we set moderation standards too low, then big social-media companies are evil because they're not doing anything about harmful content. If we set those standards too high, then big social-media companies are evil because monopoly. And there never seems to be any space in between. We need something better than just an excuse to hate on Facebook/Twitter/YouTube/etc.