4 ms·
My searching on this topic turned up this interesting book - http://www.amazon.com/Remote-Sensing-Archaeology-Interdisciplinary-Contributions/dp/038744615X/ref=
by xbryanx 15y ago
My searching on this topic turned up this interesting book - http://www.amazon.com/Remote-Sensing-Archaeology-Interdisciplinary-Contributions/dp/038744615X/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b http://www.amazon.com/Remote-Sensing-Archaeology-Interdiscip...
Seems like these techniques are going to radically change how we find new archaeological sites. Tech. project idea: Build some tools to help archaeologists learn and share from each other with this data. Build a world wide database of IR imagery just a few meters below the surface?
- phlux 15y agoBuild a small sensor array with OTS parts arduino etc and attach to balloon that the Arch can use in the field to look around his position in real time with such techniques. And mount to DIYDrones for added awesome.
- mturmon 15y agoYes, the idea in the OP is not new. To my knowledge, the first people to use remote sensing data in an archeological context used radar (SRTM, a synthetic aperture radar mapping mission that flew on the space shuttle). Radar can penetrate the land to a depth of ~meters depending on lots of factors. They discovered the lost city of Ubar, which was a trading city (ca. 3000 BC) in the Arabian peninsula that had been lost to the desert. They discovered it because trails that had formerly led into Ubar gave off stronger radar reflections. Later on-site digs confirmed actual ruins. This was in 1992. A link: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01721 http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA01721 The person who blurbed the book you found, Charles Elachi, was a key member of the team that designed the radar instrument that found Ubar. All of the SRTM data is online somewhere. The desert turns out to be a really good place to look for stuff. Less clutter.