I'll add that most of my objection here is to the comment to which I originally replied. I really dislike the "there's no objectively correct line, so we should

I'll add that most of my objection here is to the comment to which I originally replied. I really dislike the "there's no objectively correct line, so we shouldn't draw a line at all" point of view. As to your follow up question — I think the root of the issue is not "is it right for a company to make speech decisions" but "is it right for a company to wield so much power over public discourse?" IMO it should remain a moral issue, and we should simply aggressively break up entities that attain "public square" status.