3 ms·
All I said was that YouTube should be treated as a utility - - e.g. you can't kick people off your service unless they've broken the law. That is the extent of
by starik36 6y ago
All I said was that YouTube should be treated as a utility - - e.g. you can't kick people off your service unless they've broken the law. That is the extent of its treatment as a utility. It doesn't prevent anyone from competing against them.
- Grimm1 6y ago"All I said was that YouTube should be treated as a utility" Right I don't think you've understood the implications of being a utility in the US. In the US: "Public utilities commissions may grant public utilities certain monopoly rights to facilitate servicing a given geographic area with a single system. For example, in California, prohibitions against anticompetitive behavior under the Unfair Practices Law do not apply to public utility corporations." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/public_utility#:~:text=A%20public%20utility%20is%20an,heat%2C%20and%20television%20cable%20systems https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/public_utility#:~:text=A%20p....