2 ms·
It's likely that the nm number will continue to get smaller, since the node name is marketing at this point, and isn't related to any physical semiconductor mea
by theandrewbailey 6y ago
It's likely that the nm number will continue to get smaller, since the node name is marketing at this point, and isn't related to any physical semiconductor measurement anymore.
As for quantum tunneling, it is likely to be mitigated or exploited at some point. If not, maybe we'll have to use something else, like gallium arsenide[0] instead of silicon.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallium_arsenide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallium_arsenide
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoSince it's marketing, even 0 isn't a limit, is it? "To negative infinity, and beyond!"