2 ms·

I'm not trying to make an argument that fits within or agrees with current legislation. I am making a purely logical argument - I'm sure for example there's stu

• masklinn 15y ago
  > I'm sure for example there's stuff in twitters ToS that give them rights over whatever you post so that you couldn't claim compensations from them, and ditto SO. Gives them. If you're posting pictures on Twitter or putting comments on SO, you can hardly fault them for displaying those. But when AP starts selling your twitter pictures or SO comments on its feed, it's a whole different bucket of filth, and a very, very different situation. We're discussing the second case here, not "I put a comment on news.yc and news.yc displays it".