5 ms·
Yeah, but no one is making a new oppressive law. Parler violated their ToS and Google, Apples, Amazon are within their rights to do this. If a court finds other
by sanp 6y ago
Yeah, but no one is making a new oppressive law. Parler violated their ToS and Google, Apples, Amazon are within their rights to do this. If a court finds otherwise (and see a contractual breach) and they have to backtrack we will know the system worked as intended.
- Proziam 6y agoIf Parler violates the ToS then Twitter surely does as well. But, since [0]Twitter pays Amazon an obscene amount of money they are immune. Facebook is in a similar position where they've been [1]enjoying the rewards of 'selective non-enforcement' for a very long time now. I probably disagree with just about everything ever said on Parler but it's difficult not to point out this absolutely reeks. [0]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-15/twitter-will-use-amazon-web-services-to-power-user-feeds https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-15/twitter-w... [1] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/07/capitol-riot-a-rocket-ship-for-twitter-and-facebook-ad-media-expert-says.html https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/07/capitol-riot-a-rocket-ship-f... EDIT - I can't tell if the downvotes are people mistakenly believing I'm defending Parler or because they believe that $Big_Tech is free of blame.