4 ms·
This is actually a good question (rather than argument) for one reason: it's extremely simple to measure and debunk. Go to a few places with good 5G and 4G cov
by arghwhat 6y ago
This is actually a good question (rather than argument) for one reason: it's extremely simple to measure and debunk.
Go to a few places with good 5G and 4G coverage, measure EMF, compare, see nothing interesting and call it a day.
- lima 6y agoIt's not that simple - frequency and modulation can make a difference in terms of biological interactions. Not that I believe there to be any harmful effects.
- arghwhat 6y agoThe article specifically mentions field strength alone exceeding health recommendations. This can easily be measured and debunked. Other claims will be addressed separately. Frequency makes a difference, by affecting penetration and energy level. Signal modulation leads to harmonics and/or pulsing fields, but saying that modulation matters is quite misleading as it is simply frequency and power variation. (For 5G, the end-result should end up being less energy as reduced cell size leads to reduced broadcast power on both ends of the connection, dissipated entirely as heat in a lower volume of tissue as penetration depth has dropped - a net win)