3 ms·
Sure, but as a counter example Docker performance on Mac has historically been abysmal[0][1], but everyone on Mac I know still develops using it. We ignore the
by acoard 6y ago
Sure, but as a counter example Docker performance on Mac has historically been abysmal[0][1], but everyone on Mac I know still develops using it. We ignore the performance hit on dev machines, knowing it won't affect prod (Linux servers).
I don't see why this pattern would fail to hold, but am open to new perspectives.
[0] https://dev.to/ericnograles/why-is-docker-on-macos-so-much-worse-than-linux-flh https://dev.to/ericnograles/why-is-docker-on-macos-so-much-w...
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/docker/comments/bh8rpf/docker_performance_on_macos_vs_native_linux/ https://www.reddit.com/r/docker/comments/bh8rpf/docker_perfo...
- remexre 6y agoThe VM that uses takes advantage of hardware-accelerated virtualization, for running amd64 VMs on amd64 CPUs. You don't have hardware-accelerated virtualization for amd64 VMs on any ARM CPUs I know of...
- fomine3 6y agoAbysmal Docker performance on non-Linux is mainly because of filesystem isn't native, not by CPU virtualization.