That’s what I used to think, but now more companies use “open” with non-OSI licenses and they aren’t run out of town and told STFU. Personally, any project usi

That’s what I used to think, but now more companies use “open” with non-OSI licenses and they aren’t run out of town and told STFU. Personally, any project using “open” in the name that’s not OSI, I pretty much ignore. But it seems to be growing (eg, “open core”, “openai”, stuff like this taking about open with non-open licenses). It’s getting hard to filter out. One of the benefits I think to CCn is that it clearly lets users know what is and is not allowed. Having OSIn might help with people who don’t read licenses for fun.