3 ms·
Given that the text of the SSPL amounts to a minor edit to that of the AGPL (at best): no. The SSPL text is still a derivative of the AGPL text, which is copyr
by pritambaral 6y ago
Given that the text of the SSPL amounts to a minor edit to that of the AGPL (at best): no.
The SSPL text is still a derivative of the AGPL text, which is copyrighted and licensed under the following terms (from https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html):
Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <https://fsf.org/ https://fsf.org/>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
- pyb 6y agoI thought so. IANAL, but it looks like a blatant copyright violation to me. This indicates that the SSPL may not have been written by a lawyer.