4 ms·
> Even Thailand is doing that now. The royals are largely symbolic and don't exercise direct political power. But there's still a strong cultural attachment. D
by xenocratus 6y ago
> Even Thailand is doing that now. The royals are largely symbolic and don't exercise direct political power. But there's still a strong cultural attachment.
Don't know how biased the Economist is on this, but they've had a number of articles talking about the increasing role of the current king. An example is linked below.
https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/10/14/thailands-king-seeks-to-bring-back-absolute-monarchy https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/10/14/thailands-king...
https://web.archive.org/web/20210103234100if_/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/10/14/thailands-king-seeks-to-bring-back-absolute-monarchy https://web.archive.org/web/20210103234100if_/https://www.ec...
- notahacker 6y agoThailand has been technically a constitutional monarchy like the UK since 1932. But the constitutional role of a monarch is a lot bigger in a country which has had more coups than most countries have had elections in the time period since, and everyone involved has tried to claim their legitimacy comes from the monarch