4 ms·

> I am witnessing the reality that it’s never been easier and cheaper in the history of the world to reach almost everyone in the world within seconds. Only as

> I am witnessing the reality that it’s never been easier and cheaper in the history of the world to reach almost everyone in the world within seconds. Only as long you don't have the wrong opinion. > It’s extremely easy to build a website, host it, have people type in a few letters and numbers, and “reach” each other. It’s never been easier, or cheaper. It’s as free market as it gets. And where do you find it? Google? Also the witch-hunt doesn't stop there. Next up is the hosting (looking at Parler). I can't wait to see when registrars are next and you have to type in a dynamic IP given by the ISP. But everyone could reach you, they just have to know the IP. If that really would be viable ISP would be the next logical step in the witch-hunt.

dastx 6y ago
> Only as long you don't have the wrong opinion. With "wrong opinion" do you mean inciting hatred and violence, and spreading misinformation? Because by that logic, we should also allow ISIS, Al-Qaeda et al. to do their thing. Outside of these "wrong" opinions, parent commenter is pretty accurate. I've seen and heard of people launching a website in less than a day. Let's not forget that freedom of speech does not give you freedom from consequences. AWS, Twitter, Google, Apple and everyone else has no obligation to give you a platform, especially when it looks bad on them, or it goes against their ahem morals (or rather: the employee's morals). Just like I, as an equal citizen, have no reason to hear you out or to spread your message, if I don't like your message.
- antibuddy 6y ago
  > With "wrong opinion" do you mean inciting hatred and violence, and spreading misinformation? Hey, how about you show me where Parler incited violence or where Trump did that. I don't care about buzzwords like misinformation or hatred - Twitter cares neither - but I do care about inciting violence. In exchange I show you tweets from Khamanei - ayatollah of Iran. > Because by that logic, we should also allow ISIS, Al-Qaeda et al. to do their thing. ISIS/Al-Qaeda/Al-Nusra/Taliban whatever are terrorist groups; they don't only incite violence. Also putting misinformation and hatred in the same category as actual terror groups is really not wise.

dastx 6y ago

> Only as long you don't have the wrong opinion. With "wrong opinion" do you mean inciting hatred and violence, and spreading misinformation? Because by that logic, we should also allow ISIS, Al-Qaeda et al. to do their thing. Outside of these "wrong" opinions, parent commenter is pretty accurate. I've seen and heard of people launching a website in less than a day. Let's not forget that freedom of speech does not give you freedom from consequences. AWS, Twitter, Google, Apple and everyone else has no obligation to give you a platform, especially when it looks bad on them, or it goes against their ahem morals (or rather: the employee's morals). Just like I, as an equal citizen, have no reason to hear you out or to spread your message, if I don't like your message.

antibuddy 6y ago
> With "wrong opinion" do you mean inciting hatred and violence, and spreading misinformation? Hey, how about you show me where Parler incited violence or where Trump did that. I don't care about buzzwords like misinformation or hatred - Twitter cares neither - but I do care about inciting violence. In exchange I show you tweets from Khamanei - ayatollah of Iran. > Because by that logic, we should also allow ISIS, Al-Qaeda et al. to do their thing. ISIS/Al-Qaeda/Al-Nusra/Taliban whatever are terrorist groups; they don't only incite violence. Also putting misinformation and hatred in the same category as actual terror groups is really not wise.