3 ms·
Eh... I'm not convinced on the argument of offset != index, because the reality beneath arrays and lists is that it is offset based. Arrays are the obvious one
by AnIdiotOnTheNet 6y ago
Eh... I'm not convinced on the argument of offset != index, because the reality beneath arrays and lists is that it is offset based.
Arrays are the obvious one: assuming no associated metadata they are an address to the first (zeroth?) element.
Even things like linked lists are essentially offset based: It's an address of the first (zeroth) node. The next node is 1 node away from that.
In general I don't think it is a good idea to abstract too far away from how things actually work. And in that sense, 1-based indexing in LUA does make sense since LUA is table based and '1' here is an arbitrary identifier.