2 ms·
But this is incorrect answer. The kids had to be there before 7.30 or they will be hungry. Latest time non starving kid can be there is 7.30 not 9am. It is "oh
by dvh 6y ago
But this is incorrect answer. The kids had to be there before 7.30 or they will be hungry. Latest time non starving kid can be there is 7.30 not 9am.
It is "oh btw classes start at 9 but your kid have to be before 7.30".
There are two possible latest times and it really cannot be answered until we know if kid ate or not. Is it possible to bring non fed kid at 9, sure but it's not right. This is poorly stated question for a comprehension test.
Because it is not stated whether kid is fed or not, therefore latest possible time is 7.30
KidFed Arrival Outcome
True 7.30 Good
False 7.30 Good
True 9.00 Good
False 9.00 Bad
9.00 is only time with possible bad outcome.
My point is that it is very poorly specified test and that's causing poor results.
- lifeisstillgood 6y agoI agree - there is a sample sentence comprehension - and you have to work hard to understand what the intent of the question is (far harder than actually trying to comprehend the question) cf >>> The sentence-processing items require the respondent to assess whether a sentence makes sense in terms of the properties of the real world or the internal logic of the sentence. Now "a person who is 20 is older than a person who is 30". Does that "make sense"? Is "sense" meaning the statement is true or not? If we ignore if the statement is true and just go with making sense then the next question "a comfortable pillow is soft and rocky" also makes sense even if it is wrong - but i suspect that would be makred as not making sense.