4 ms·
I think the idea is that if they use audible frequencies, the user will, well, _hear_ them.
by quenix 6y ago
I think the idea is that if they use audible frequencies, the user will, well, _hear_ them.
- eru 6y agoPeople are used to artifacts in zoom calls, the sound quality ain't always the best. I also noticed that zoom corrects for lag in my connection by speeding up and slowing down speech. (I noticed that when my counterpart was running a metronome.) Zoom could artificially introduce micro-lags to encode data. Eg as a human I can't really tell whether some sound starts on an even or an odd milli-second.
- ddingus 6y agohttps://blogalytics.typepad.com/files/a-technical-look-at-arbitrons-ppm-system.pdf https://blogalytics.typepad.com/files/a-technical-look-at-ar... Not really. And if a user does, they will hear rather mundane codec artifacts, and or noise that is basically like other noise. Given a redundant mark, and the system I linked has multiple, concurrent redundancy, the chance of the mark surviving grows with the amount of audio. They can literally drop marks during speech the entire time.
- j4yav 6y agoIt's not like it's a voiceover that explains who is watching the video. It can be a series of quiet pops.