3 ms·
So are Facebook and Twitter direct foreign interference in the democratic process of every country other than the US? Bear in mind that Twitter's exec in charg
by MikeUt 6y ago
So are Facebook and Twitter direct foreign interference in the democratic process of every country other than the US?
Bear in mind that Twitter's exec in charge of the Middle East is a British army psyops officer: https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-executive-revealed-psyops-soldier-spreading-disinformation-across-social-media-1462406 https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-executive-revealed-psyops-s...
- myWindoonn 6y agoActually, yes, large companies often interfere in foreign governments' affairs. For a good recent example involving Facebook, consider the situation in Myanmar. Eric Schmidt, a revolving-door executive who connected Google/Alphabet to the federal government, went to Myanmar in 2013 as they were transitioning from a junta to a democracy [0] in order to advocate that they adopt free and open Internet access [3]. That year, Myanmar allowed foreign telecommunications companies to operate, dropping the price of SIM cards by a hundredfold [1]. Facebook went live in Myanmar that year too, and enabled the junta to start spreading racist memes. Violence started to spread, and by 2016, an ongoing government-supported genocide of the Rohingya had started [2]. I am not saying that tech companies desired a genocide, but I am saying that their policies, platforms, and interference in foreign affairs are complicit in genocide. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011%E2%80%932015_Myanmar_political_reforms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011%E2%80%932015_Myanmar_poli... [1] https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-45449938 https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-45449938 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_genocide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_genocide [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schmidt#Advocating_open_Internet_use_in_Myanmar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schmidt#Advocating_open_I...