3 ms·
I really don't know enough to say one way or the other, but for those who care, here is some skepticism about Lisi's paper: http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/11/ex
by rguzman 18y ago
I really don't know enough to say one way or the other, but for those who care, here is some skepticism about Lisi's paper: http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/11/exceptionally-simple-theory-of.html http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/11/exceptionally-simple-theor...
- vsingh 18y agoThis Lubos Motl guy seems to be a sort of Erik Naggum of physics. Yikes.
- rguzman 18y agoThis also an older post back from when Lisi's paper first came out: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=617 http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=617 Again, I don't really know too much about this stuff, but it should be interesting to anyone who'd like to get to the bottom of how credible the paper is.