3 ms·
Intervene early and permanently. Trading second and third chances for bio parents at the cost of children's futures is too high a cost in my opinion.
by frankydp 6y ago
Intervene early and permanently.
Trading second and third chances for bio parents at the cost of children's futures is too high a cost in my opinion.
- ativzzz 6y agoThe early and permanent intervention would be to somehow convince (or forbid?) parents who are likely to raise such a child from having a child, but this opens up a giant can of ethical worms e.g. eugenics. Better education around sex and children, as well as easy access to birth control would go a long way.
- frankydp 6y agoNo my comment is simply to advocate for the development of the child over the second chances for the parent. Permanency is a child welfare term regarding a permanent placement for the child, not some grotesques parent sterilization program as you are implying. You are operating under the incorrect assumption that I somehow think the parents are at fault, my argument is that the children should not be the ones that pay for the learning process of the parents. Also implying that I am a Nazi/eugenics promoter is a red hearing and you should be ashamed of yourself.