> I think the EPA and Army Corps frown upon massive thermal pollution of the Great Lakes now. massive? The smallest (by volume) of the great lakes, erie, is o

> I think the EPA and Army Corps frown upon massive thermal pollution of the Great Lakes now. massive? The smallest (by volume) of the great lakes, erie, is over 480 km^3. Lake Michigan, the one near Chicago, is over 4,900 km^3. That amount of thermal mass isn't going to be significantly affected by hundreds of data centers.