> a simpler, safer fit-for-purpose tool Generics nothing more or less than a safety feature. Right now code that would use generics instead use the empty inte

> a simpler, safer fit-for-purpose tool Generics nothing more or less than a safety feature. Right now code that would use generics instead use the empty interface instead, which is effectively opting out of the type system entirely. I'm personally ambivalent on whether go adds generics or not but framing a lack of generics as a safety feature is the most absurd thing I've heard today.