14 ms·
See the Monero team's response here: https://www.getmonero.org/2018/03/29/response-to-an-empirical-analysis-of-traceability.html https://www.getmonero.org/2018/
by eindiran 6y ago
See the Monero team's response here: https://www.getmonero.org/2018/03/29/response-to-an-empirical-analysis-of-traceability.html https://www.getmonero.org/2018/03/29/response-to-an-empirica...
Full original paper here: https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2018/3/article-p143.xml https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2018/3/arti...
- gruez 6y ago>See the Monero team's response here: https://www.getmonero.org/2018/03/29/response-to-an-empirica https://www.getmonero.org/2018/03/29/response-to-an-empirica... I skimmed the response and the linked paper. It looks like the paper and the article was mostly talking about deficiency in the decoy selection algorithm, whereas the video I linked was talking about the wider problem of taint trees on repeated transactions. That aspect doesn't seem to be addressed in the response.