3 ms·
Yeah I agree that’s the point of the article. I think what I wrote would still be a reason even if it is rationalised differently. The argument that “patients
by dan-robertson 6y ago
Yeah I agree that’s the point of the article. I think what I wrote would still be a reason even if it is rationalised differently.
The argument that “patients won’t know the difference so I can just do whatever” must break down at some point (hopefully before malpractice) but I think an argument of “I’ll just keep doing what I did before, it’s worked fine so far” doesn’t encourage worsening treatment or paying for more experimentation.
- f6v 6y agoAs somebody said here, first line drug is prescribed since it’s know to work based on experience. Any experimentation puts too much unwanted responsibility on the doctor.