5 ms·
Exactly. This was the right path in this case. The value is for the consumer, if he could attract just 100K visitors per month, that's $500,000/year. Not onl
by sixQuarks 6y ago
Exactly. This was the right path in this case. The value is for the consumer, if he could attract just 100K visitors per month, that's $500,000/year.
Not only that, he would have a highly targeted group of users that he could tailor all kinds of products and services to.
- ivalm 6y agoYou need 1mil visitors for 500k.
- saaaaaam 6y agoIndeed. Which what 100k per month comes to, give or take :)
- yaboy 6y agoYou’re both wrong. 100k visitors per month ≠ 100k unique users per month. Very different things!
- sixQuarks 6y agoYou're being super nit-picky. It should have been assumed 100K "visitors" meant uniques, but I knew someone like you might make this comment. 100K * 12 = 1,200,000 visitors. I added a 20% margin to account for return visitors.
- yaboy 6y agoI’d like to see you tell your founder or CMO that the difference between monthly visitors and monthly unique visitors is “super nit-picky”. The 20% margin is risible and those who live by SEO die by SEO: https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-marketing-strategy-for-startups https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-mark...
- saaaaaam 6y agoWell, quite! But then I pretty much assumed it was a shorthand amongst peers so (over) explanation perhaps wasn’t really necessary...