I think it was your mistake to put so much emphasis on judicial impartiality. Election results were certified, and challenges to them rejected, not because of

I think it was your mistake to put so much emphasis on judicial impartiality. Election results were certified, and challenges to them rejected, not because of judge impartiality (which is a quality of the judge), but because the facts of the election are independently verifiable (which is a quality of the world). Judges are required to identify facts and apply the law to those facts. Doing so does not require impartiality, only adherence to reality. That is the judicial basis for rejecting challenges to election results.