4 ms·
Changing a threshold is not changing the underlying data. One is attempting to be rational and iterate through policy, and the other is lying. Edit: Just to
by esoterae 6y ago
Changing a threshold is not changing the underlying data. One is attempting to be rational and iterate through policy, and the other is lying.
Edit: Just to be explicit, yes I'm calling out the false equivalence as a logical fallacy.
- salmon30salmon 6y agoRight no shit. What I'm arguing is that people take the path of least resistance and it would have been far easier to announce a policy change than cook the books. I am saying that if opening up was the only reason, I do not believe that's the path they would take. Of course I'm just basing this off of my own feels.
- yazaddaruvala 6y agoMaking a policy change has consequences. “De Santis made a terrible policy change, X people are now dead” is a very different headline than “after the data suggested Florida open up, X people are now dead”. I don’t know if there is a conspiracy, but your argument regarding motivation is definitely not thorough.