4 ms·
Came here to say the exact same thing. If anything him living for 3 month in a highly secure area without doing anything nefarious is proof that he is not a dan
by cycomanic 6y ago
Came here to say the exact same thing. If anything him living for 3 month in a highly secure area without doing anything nefarious is proof that he is not a danger to the community.
What is wrong with that judge, if it was the prosecute saying this ok, but the judge?!
- bonoboTP 6y agoThey often reason backwards. They want to order bail, but danger-to-community is a required condition for bail (as pointed out in another comment), so they proclaim that he is indeed a danger.
- scotty79 6y agoSo is it ok for the judge to lie?
- astrange 6y agoIt's called "arguing in the alternative". This is why abolishing cash bail has been popular lately, although I don't know how it's working.
- snarfy 6y agoIf he's not a danger, then why require bail?
- notyourday 6y ago> If he's not a danger, then why require bail? To ensure the defendant has intensives to come back for trial