2 ms·
>I don't get it. -I just said that she is probably perfectly capable of interpreting simple data. -That you don't have to be a "data scientist" to understand
by nix23 6y ago
>I don't get it.
-I just said that she is probably perfectly capable of interpreting simple data.
-That you don't have to be a "data scientist" to understand simple data.
-Data Scientist is not a real Job but a base training (learn tooling and a bit statistic)
-A Mathematician/statistician/scientific-programmer has probably more of a clue what data's and statistics are and how to interpret them then any "based trained data-scientist".
-If it's so complicated you would need a specialized covid-data-scientist/mathematician, but it's NOT....compared to let's say, what Surgeons do...hence the degree in Medicine, with specialization on surgery.
I did not say she's wrong or right, but to say that someone has no clue because he/she is not even specialized in "fill in occupation" or employed as "fill in occupation" is just plain wrong, and shuts down every other opinion.
Just look for a example at Apollo 1, a fireman or chemist would have probably said: WHAT! filling the Cabin with pure oxygen is a terrible idea!!
But he's/she is not a Astronaut, Doctor or Rocket Scientist. With the logic here, he's maybe capable of understanding rocket-fuel or how to put out fires, but has no clue of humans and what they need in space...and he's not even employed as Human-equipment-specialist.