18 ms·
The article's first and most prominent criticism is that it costs at least $30-$60, which might be a barrier to mass adoption but for most HN readers is not a s
by dmurray 6y ago
The article's first and most prominent criticism is that it costs at least $30-$60, which might be a barrier to mass adoption but for most HN readers is not a serious reason not to use it.
- girvo 6y agoI own two (one as a backup in my safe in case I lose this one. They all have the same TOTP stuff and setup in every service side by side where possible), to agree with you. Though it’ll be lovely when your iPhone can be a U2F key through their hardware security chips and some OS support, if I’m dreaming out loud.
- Rafert 6y agoHave I got good news for you: https://webkit.org/blog/11312/meet-face-id-and-touch-id-for-the-web/ https://webkit.org/blog/11312/meet-face-id-and-touch-id-for-... - ICYMI WebAuthn is the successor to U2F.
- chris37879 6y agoI do like phones are building in these keys, it makes them way more accessible to the general population, and generally not a pain to use. And then those of us with physical keys get better support too :)
- dkersten 6y agoAnd the third is that they leave their keys in their coat. When I’m at home, I leave my keys (and therefore my yubikey which is on my key ring) on my desk and when I’m out, I always keep them on my person and never unattended. So that leaves ease of setup and support. Since setup only has to be done once per site, and I only bother with important sites, that’s not a major deal for me either.