3 ms·

I'm not sure I follow/agree on blanket surveillance of a workplace... Would this translate to a bank as well? Having a recording of an armed robbery or theft du

• IfOnlyYouKnew 6y ago
  Banks are high-risk, and video surveillance is longstanding practice and generally fine. BUT I believe it is required to face the customer area (and, therefore, film employees mostly from the back). There's also usually a "pit"-like work area that's employee-only and I would imagine that's out of bounds, as well.
• detaro 6y ago
  In the way it's described in the article? yes, that very likely wouldn't fly in a bank as well. Banks do have video surveillance, but with more restricted terms, e.g. clear information which areas are monitored, risk assessments which areas justify being monitored, restricted recording (i.e. only very short-term storage that needs human intervention to be preserved), processes around when and through whom recordings can be accessed at all, ...