> that has nothing to do with the principle of banning people from society based on legal speech Your comment is bizarre and nonsensical. No one has been "bann

> that has nothing to do with the principle of banning people from society based on legal speech Your comment is bizarre and nonsensical. No one has been "banned from society" based on "legal speech", a meaningless phrase. A lot of people have been banned from using specific internet services because they used them to make threats of violence, or to tell dangerous lies about COVID. This isn't "banning them from society". Get a grip! Also, we are talking two classes of people here: * people who work against humanity to spread COVID-19 based on a pack of obvious lies * people who wish to violently overthrow the elected US government based on a pack of obvious lies and frankly, these people can get fucked. They are destroying the country and the planet, and they deserve every single penalty the law can give them. If private corporations, which Republicans claim to love, use their perfectly legal power to stop doing business with horrible psychopaths, then good for them. One side went crazy, and now we have to choose sides. Are you on the side of the delusional hateful lawbreaking violent psychopaths, or with the majority? (My theory - you are not with the majority.)