4 ms·
Actually better education and training is often the only real solution. It isn't "victim blaming" if the situation is at least theoretically within the victim'
by scottLobster 6y ago
Actually better education and training is often the only real solution. It isn't "victim blaming" if the situation is at least theoretically within the victim's control. If some random "plumber" that I didn't call for shows up at my house, asking to be let in to replace some of my pipes, and I say "okay", then he robs me, is it victim blaming to say perhaps I should have been more suspicious of strange plumbers randomly showing up at my house to do work?
- lisper 6y ago> education and training is often the only real solution No. That is never the real solution. At best it is a necessary evil, but generally resorting to this is a reflection of a failure of imagination. The reverse authentication problem in particular is easily solved by the right UI design plus some improved infrastructure behind the scenes. Certificate pinning, for example, would help a lot. The hard part is not coming up with a solution, or even implementing it, but convincing everyone to adopt the solution because it doesn't help unless it is widely deployed.
- alisonkisk 6y agoExplain how any solution prevents the user from opting out of yubikey and typing self-XSS into Dev console to get owned. Unless you have a 100% vendor controlled system, (more than Apple + ChromeOS combine) you have to rely on the user not breaking their own security.
- rdiddly 6y agoIf the easy part is the implementation and the hard part is convincing people of its value then I can say one or more of the following are true: - Your solution is not sufficiently great as to be self-evidently great. - People (i.e. the victim) must be faulted (i.e. blamed) for their inability to be convinced of its inherent majesty. - Given convincing's similarity and overlap both with educating and with training, you are having a failure of imagination. (Source: Your comment.)
- lisper 6y agoThe problem is that the people who need to be convinced are not the people who are being harmed by phishing. The people who are being harmed by phishing (non-technically-savvy end-users) are powerless. The people who need to be convinced of the merits of the solution are browser vendors and web site operators. Both groups would need to work together to solve the problem. Getting that to happen is the hard part. It's a very real problem, but it's a political problem, not a technical one.