4 ms·
I'd add a different perspective: do you really need a technical co-founder? There is rarely a need for you to have a technical co-founder and usually it's when
by andrejguran 6y ago
I'd add a different perspective: do you really need a technical co-founder?
There is rarely a need for you to have a technical co-founder and usually it's when your startup is highly technical. If it's not new operating system, breakthrough in artificial intelligence or self driving washing machine think how can you prove your concept without a co-founder.
First think how can you prove your concept without any technical skills. Can your idea be implemented via spreadsheet? Can you do everything manually? Can you write fake forms and then send email by yourself?
If not then second question comes to mind: Can you hire someone to build a prototype to prove the idea? Are you willing to invest few thousand dollars into a prototype to prove your hypothesis, gather initial data and then approach investors to raise initial capital to hire team of engineer that would build the product?
Again: rarely there is a need for a technical co-founder and if your startup is not progressing only because you can't find one, well I have bad news for you son. You have 99 problems but technical co-founder won't solve more than 1!
- igorrek 6y agoHaha, I love your 99 analogy! I am in fact thinking in this direction already (eg. Zapier and similar) and will do majority of ground-work myself. But I am also aware that my topic is sensitive, so it will be hard to prove that it works. I am worried there is a big difference between some playgorund and the real deal. I was thinking about hiring someone - but then I also watched Y Combinator stuff and realised it will be very hard for me to iterate and that my failure probability will be much higher. Ah and btw: here is my link https://bit.ly/cofounder-wanted https://bit.ly/cofounder-wanted