3 ms·
> On top of that, those gig companies that paid handsomely to create and market Prop 22 to voters are now passing on the cost for these scant benefits to consum
by megaman821 6y ago
> On top of that, those gig companies that paid handsomely to create and market Prop 22 to voters are now passing on the cost for these scant benefits to consumers
If you don't know that the costs of company are ultimately paid by the consumers, maybe you should stop writing on the topic. How was this supposed to work? Workers would be paid $25/hr with rides costing the same and the money would magically manifest itself?
- EliRivers 6y agoReduced profit is the other source, along with blowing through investment capital from people with big pockets who feel lucky.
- PoignardAzur 6y agoIn practice that doesn't really work. These companies rely on economies of scale, and make minuscule margins (and yes, investment capital, but that kind of goes away if you try to regulate profits into oblivion). So reducing profits doesn't have much of an effect on consumers or drivers. Anything that profits one is probably going to cost the other.
- EliRivers 6y agoTo no small extent, this is something of the point in this case. These jobs straight up shouldn't exist because they're simply not profitable and many of them never will be; we're seeing companies with no hope of becoming properly profitable trying to push their costs onto their own employees, rather than simply vanishing as they should. Investment capital is what they burn while they try to become profitable, and if that doesn't work, the company should vanish or find another investor willing to take the gamble.
- cdmckay 6y agoHave you considered that maybe it wasn’t a viable business model to start with?