3 ms·
I wanted to disagree with the headline. Then I read the article and do see their point. I’ve been a big proponent of Signal for years and donated for the first
by tailspin2019 6y ago
I wanted to disagree with the headline. Then I read the article and do see their point.
I’ve been a big proponent of Signal for years and donated for the first time during their outage.
But I do think this is a conversation worth having.
I’d also like to understand more about this:
> In fact, the Signal server code [0] hasn’t even been updated since April 2020. You’re telling me it’s undergone no changes?
[0]: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server
- solstice 6y agoIf all the interesting stuff happens on the client and the server "just" forwards encrypted messages, why would the server need frequent updates?
- bilal4hmed 6y agoif you go to the main git page https://github.com/signalapp https://github.com/signalapp you can see that changes were made to the server 8 hours ago. So something is happening on the server, the public cant see it. I definitely would like to see whats happening given. I trust them, but we definitely need to see whats on the server code.
- tailspin2019 6y agoI think those changes could just be Pull Requests? Not necessarily code merged to master/main. Unless you’re spotting something that I’m not?
- bilal4hmed 6y agothe last PR was 9 hours ago https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server/pulls https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server/pulls while the main page says update was 8. Thats what threw me off
- cevn 6y agoI believe the 8 hours ago activity is from someone opening a PR, not some weird trick to update git repositories without being seen.
- mecanicox 6y agoI disagree too, I known the people behind signal and signal protocol by far 10 years, I been see their work for a long time in different fields, when I read "We can do better than Signal" It's a natural thought human to find better in all things, but I don't really see more in the article