4 ms·
Lots of great discussion here already. My own perspective is that it depends on both your goals and your source of funding. If your goal is to disrupt an existi
by abhaysaxena_hk 6y ago
Lots of great discussion here already. My own perspective is that it depends on both your goals and your source of funding. If your goal is to disrupt an existing industry, or create something brand new then speed is more important than frugality. If you are trying to create a business that solves existing problems but in a cheaper / better way (and nothing wrong with that) then frugality is more important as staying power is crucial.
In fact, staying power is IMO the most critical determinant of success. If you can stay in business then you can learn from your mistakes and pivot. In that case the discussion between frugality and speed is all about calculating your staying power, which goes back to your source of funding :)
- kamroot 6y agoThis makes sense. When I was reading the history of Intel vs Motorola it seemed like Motorola had better chip architecture but Intel won the market and then of course pivoted from there. Current state of intel is an entirely different matter.
- malavwarke 6y agomakes sense, disrupting an existing industry then been frugal is great and yes definitely sustaining over a period of time is the key.