3 ms·
There's no inherent reason to have an identity separate from the one the site you're joining grants you. I'd guess that site is leveraging the effort which web
by networkimprov 6y ago
There's no inherent reason to have an identity separate from the one the site you're joining grants you.
I'd guess that site is leveraging the effort which webmail providers spend to weed out bots and sock-puppets. And perhaps they use the address for adtech purposes. But I don't know for sure.
I'd love to hear from such sites about how they use customer email. If it's not primarily for communication, it may not make sense to accommodate it in TMTP.
- doctorfoo 6y agoFor password reset?
- iovrthoughtthis 6y ago> There's no inherent reason to have an identity separate from the one the site you're joining grants you. What do you mean? > I'd guess that site is leveraging the effort which webmail providers spend to weed out bots and sock-puppets. And perhaps they use the address for adtech purposes. But I don't know for sure. It’s a lot like having a physical address which is used as a core part of meatspace identity management. > I'd love to hear from such sites about how they use customer email. If it's not primarily for communication, it may not make sense to accommodate it in TMTP. A shared unique identifier (value for user is that it is consistent across services). A means of authentication when primary auth (password) cant be used (company sends links etc). 1-1 channel of communication (notifications of activity or changes in a service). Obviously, it’s just my opinion, but making a new messaging protocol won’t fix email. My hunch is that is because email’s primary purpose (to the end user) is not to provide a messaging channel but to provide an identity.
- Ir0nMan 6y agoHow would you suggest handling password resets?