3 ms·
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fastest-windows-10-boot-time,5810.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fastest-windows-10-boot... I should have just g
by daxfohl 6y ago
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fastest-windows-10-boot-time,5810.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fastest-windows-10-boot... I should have just googled it. So 4 seconds for optane and 5 for Samsung. I'm surprised, but it looks legit. Though I wonder now if pcie4 changes things since the article was published.
- cm2187 6y agoThat's my point in the other post. Is that 1 second boot time gain really worth the money? Not arguing against it for heavy duty enterprise workloads. But as a consumer, at one point the extra performance is wasted on them.
- daxfohl 6y agoSure, but if you're a power user with deep pockets, you may still be interested. But you'll want to know whether you can something tangible out of it on your workstation, and it's not exclusively a multitenant cloud database optimizer (or worse, a regression for typical workstation workload performance). So, the Windows boot speed comparison provides an indication that it'll give some benefit to personal workstations too. Whether it's worth it or not is another question entirely.