4 ms·
The patent is really only half of the story here. The bigger question is why does the US Navy own this patents? And, how does this relate to the pill shaped U
by ubertoop 6y ago
The patent is really only half of the story here.
The bigger question is why does the US Navy own this patents? And, how does this relate to the pill shaped UFO that navy pilots verified having seen over the last decade performing antigravity maneuvers?
On December 30th 2020 the United States Senate had requested for the Pentagon for an explanation of this UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon). The Senate said the Pentagon had 180 days (about half a year) to give an explanation. This explanation would be out around June/July of 2021. [1]
The patent for the "High frequency gravitational wave generator" is essentially a pill shape design, exactly like the Navy Pilots describe.
The other patent "Craft using an inertial mass reduction device" appears to be the kind of tech you would need to avoid getting squished like a grape in hyper-G accelerations.
The big questions here are
1) Why does the Navy own these patents
2) Do they have anything to do with the pill shaped UFOs the navy has reported seeing
3) Are they even real science?
[1] https://www.wilx.com/2020/12/30/the-pentagon-has-180-days-to-disclose-ufo-information https://www.wilx.com/2020/12/30/the-pentagon-has-180-days-to...
- colechristensen 6y agoPublishing nonsense is a good way to spread disinformation to your adversaries and waste their resources, likewise to “explain” things you want to keep secret which have vaguely similar properties. But also in a large organization there will be pockets of incompetence which are more expensive to eradicate than they cost to leave be. If you’re making sure to do zero nonsense, you’re probably also preventing some unexpected quality progress.
- dawnerd 6y agoReally it's only public because they want it to be seen. Secret research doesn't just end up in a patent database. I have a feeling you 100% nailed that it's just more of a distraction which makes it even more peculiar.
- skinkestek 6y ago> I have a feeling you 100% nailed that it's just more of a distraction which makes it even more peculiar. My thoughts as well and the only reason I see for doing that is if they actually have something similar and send out this to pretend they are trying to distract everyone(, or are trying to fool everyone ;-) (The above was meant to be confusing in a recursive way.)
- frongpik 6y agoAcademics can't really research this subject if they want to remain employed, but that doesn't mean the patent lies.
- ksaj 6y agoPretty much. It isn't worth continuing studies into a particular future-tech if it isn't patented, as someone who happens to hear about it through whatever means can steal it from under them, making all initial investments useless to everyone except the copycat.
- lucas_membrane 6y agoI thought that the 'inertial mass reduction' was required to provide the 10 ^33 w/m^2 required to rev the engine. That might be enough to ignite empty space.