Hmm, downvotes? Perhaps because I said "expert"? I used it in the sense of an exceptionally good person in the field, rather than the less-restrictive legal se

Hmm, downvotes? Perhaps because I said "expert"? I used it in the sense of an exceptionally good person in the field, rather than the less-restrictive legal sense, which includes those who are unexceptional, uninventive, and of average qualification. Or perhaps some are unfamiliar with PHOSITA? > A skilled person is typically defined as an expert in a relevant field who has average knowledge and ability but is not exceptional, outstanding, or brilliant. Such a person must be neither over- nor under-qualified and is deemed to be uninventive.[1] > This raises a difficult question of how to define an appropriate benchmark for AI-assisted inventions and whether/how the current standard should incorporate AI. [1] https://ijssppnet.com/file/2.%20%20%20%20Dr%20Olga%20Gurgula.pdf https://ijssppnet.com/file/2.%20%20%20%20Dr%20Olga%20Gurgula...