3 ms·
Main issue against this: Wikipedia is not in danger of any kind. Although "need for protection" is not listed in the criteria for selection according to UNESCO
by nanoanderson 15y ago
Main issue against this: Wikipedia is not in danger of any kind.
Although "need for protection" is not listed in the criteria for selection according to UNESCO's website (http://whc.unesco.org/en/criteria http://whc.unesco.org/en/criteria), the "Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage" which established the concept of World Heritage Sites specifically states that World Heritage Sites are to be used for protection of threatened sites. Page 1 of http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf states it all quite clearly.
- ceejayoz 15y ago> Main issue against this: Wikipedia is not in danger of any kind. Many of the places on the list - Notre Dame, for example - are in no such danger, either.