If this is all true, This was a very personal attack. This doesn't seem to be for financial gains but personal vendetta. Putting that aside, she should be equa

If this is all true, This was a very personal attack. This doesn't seem to be for financial gains but personal vendetta. Putting that aside, she should be equally blamed for falling for it despite being a fact checker for 21 years and also attending seminars, advisory meetings, talks and interviews as "Harvard Professor" without even going to a lecture hall once.