3 ms·
False equivalence is insidious and you would do well to reflect on that. More broadly, seeking an "unbiased" source is a bit of a fool's errand. The best you ca
by aklemm 6y ago
False equivalence is insidious and you would do well to reflect on that. More broadly, seeking an "unbiased" source is a bit of a fool's errand. The best you can do is seek "honest" sources, and the difference is massive.
- ceilingcorner 6y agoIt’s not about equivalence. If you’re going to talk about a phenomenon, but leave out all the examples which make your “side” look bad, it just seems like straight bias. I’d prefer commentators leave their identity at the door and just explore the ideas and events themselves.