4 ms·
Perhaps because these crimes do not include non-prosecuted white collar finance crimes?
by chopsueyar 15y ago
Perhaps because these crimes do not include non-prosecuted white collar finance crimes?
- sorbus 15y agoWell, yes. The article is talking about the drop in violent crime, not total crime. On the other hand, I doubt that financial crimes made up for the 5.5% drop in violent crime. There are probably no conclusive figures for non-prosecuted white-collar crimes, though, so all we have is speculation.
- chopsueyar 15y agoIn terms of victims or perpetrators? Unlike finance, rapists only have one victim at a time.
- sorbus 15y agoI didn't even think of that - I was considering each crime as being a distinct entity (eg, robbing a group of people counted as only a single crime). By counting victims, which probably makes more sense, financial crimes would more than make up for the decrease in violent crime.