Very skeptical of this study. Here's the full text: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79429-1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79429-1. The

Very skeptical of this study. Here's the full text: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79429-1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79429-1. The first thing they did was a proteomic screen of the study participants' blood samples to identify proteins that are associated with cardiovascular disease. They analyzed each of 1305 proteins with a univariate logistic regression model, and a P-value threshold of 0.05, and they found 36 proteins. There's nothing in the materials and methods about multiple-testing corrections or controlling the false discovery rate, which are standard and essential techniques when going on 'omic fishing expeditions like this. Given that many or most of these 36 proteins could be false positives, all the subsequent analysis of the associations between the proteins and the religiosity/spirituality scores and their impact on CVD is highly questionable.