3 ms·
Also to add to my previous post, the costs should be approved by a judge and they should be pretty detailed in their billing. So they are pretty much the opposi
by CogitoCogito 6y ago
Also to add to my previous post, the costs should be approved by a judge and they should be pretty detailed in their billing. So they are pretty much the opposite definition of “arbitrary”.
- BoorishBears 6y agoAre you proposing they do this... which is pretty much in line witj my point? Or under the impression they do this? Because if you follow the case info the lawyers based their compensation on a simple percentage from the get-go. The negotiation from the judge to increase the payout was also based on percentage points. This approach scales well for smaller cases. People who can't afford representation get it without trying to figure out billable hours. But as I explain in my other comment, it's worth the courts asking if this scales in a sensible way to cases like this.