The judge says: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1334.html http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1334.html "It is obvious that if the purpose

The judge says: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1334.html http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1334.html "It is obvious that if the purpose of this injunction were to preserve a secret, it would have failed in its purpose. But in so far as its purpose is to prevent intrusion or harassment, it has not failed. The fact that tens of thousands of people have named the claimant on the internet confirms that the claimant and his family need protection from intrusion into their private and family life. The fact that a question has been asked in Parliament seems to me to increase, and not to diminish the strength of his case that he and his family need that protection. The order has not protected the claimant and his family from taunting on the internet. It is still effective to protect them from taunting and other intrusion and harassment in the print media. "